Government of Southern Sudan
Liaison Office - Brussels

  You are in: Home > News and Releases > News Article Monday, February 06 2012

Sudan: The Election Paradox
Thu, June 11 2009
By ENOUGH Project [Washington, DC]
In February 2010, Sudan is scheduled to hold its first democratic elections in 24 years. General elections are required by the Comprehensive Peace Agreement, or CPA, which ended a second civil conflict between northern and southern Sudan that lasted two decades, killed 2 million people, and displaced 4 million more.

The original premise and promise of elections-democratic transformation, consolidating the peace, and making unity attractive-have been marred by the ruling National Congress Party's four-year pattern of obstructionism, which has stalled progress on the implementation of the CPA, and sapped good will between North and South.

Enough's latest strategy paper, "Sudan's Election Paradox," argues that the international community needs to lower its expectations for the election and develop a multilateral strategy to press the Government of National Unity to enact meaningful reforms regardless of who wins in 2010, revitalize CPA implementation, and establish a framework for talks in Darfur that are consistent with the power-sharing provisions of the CPA.

"The landscape in Sudan has changed in the four years since the CPA was signed, and the United States and key actors have to adjust their expectations for the elections and recalibrate their strategy to revive CPA implementation," says Enough Project policy advisor Colin Thomas-Jensen. "The goal of international support should be an overarching peace for all of Sudan accompanied by a peaceful vote that helps create momentum and builds confidence for implementing the remaining major CPA provisions, particularly how to hold a credible self-determination referendum in the South."

Adds Enough Executive Director John Norris, "The United States is pouring a lot of money into support for the elections at a time when insecurity and violence are intensifying in the South and it is almost impossible to imagine a free and fair ballot in Darfur on the planned timetable. For many, it is unclear right now how the elections fit into the framework of a broader strategic approach to a peace process."


******************************************************************************************************

---- The authors’ views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of the Ministry of Regional Cooperation or the South Sudan Government. ----

 

 

[ Back to news ]